The Cyclic Year of the Birth Year
LI Zhi Hong`s Works
2007.09.15 - 10.09

□ Essay

LI  Zhi  Hong

To  wear  red  underclothes  in  the  cyclic  year  of  one’s  birth  year  is  the  first  important  folk  custom  in  China.  Traditionally  speaking,  it  is  easy  to  “offend  the  far  superior  in  power”  in  that  year,  and  to  wear  red  underclothes  could  avoid  misfortune.  Actually,  according  to  the  version  of  the  Yin  and  Yang  and  the  Five  Elements  that  not  all  the  people  are  fit  to  do  so.  Sometimes,  there  is  only  one  step  difference  between  superstition  and  belief.  To  have  a  belief  or  not  to  have  a  belief  would  have  great  impacts  on  the  fate  of  an  individual  and  even  a  nation.

From  the  time  of  the  first  Industrial  Revolution,  scientism  started  to  prevail.  In  the  20’s  of  the  last  century,  metaphysics  became  declining  because  of  the  prevalence  of  scientism  in  China.  But  today,  as  science  and  technology  have  greatly  developed,  why  should  people  be  interested  in  metaphysics  again?  Some  people  are  born  rich,  and  some  are  born  poor.  Can  science  explain  it?  All  living  beings  have  natures,  and  that  means  “All  things  on  the  earth  have  spirits”.  The  natures  decide  the  fate,  then,  who  decides  his  nature?  

To  see  the  fate  from  the  point  of  a  country  or  a  nation,  the  effects  of  belief  and  value  concept  are  obvious;  to  see  the  fate  from  the  point  of  the  whole  mankind,  the  effects  of  human  natures  are  obvious.  Something  that  will  decide  the  fate  of  the  people  is  human  nature.  Human  beings  are  the  strongest  living  things  in  the  world,  and  so,  human  nature  not  only  decides  the  fate  of  human  beings  but  also  the  fate  of  other  living  beings.  In  the  times  of  barbarism,  it  seemed  that  human  nature  had  more  “brutish  nature”,  but  the  whole  life  environment  was  harmonious.  Now,  people  are  talking  greatly  about  release  of  human  nature  and  civilization,  and  the  human  nature  has  been  released,  but  the  whole  life  environment  is  getting  worse.  Along  with  the  time  and  the  “progress”  of  the  society,  we  don’t  know  if  the  human  nature  is  getting  civilized  or  degenerated.  

What  is  art?  Is  art  something  that  gives  people  the  sense  of  beauty  and  delight?  Many  people  like  those  classical  and  graceful  things  that  means  people  all  have  vanities  and  they  enjoy  being  immersed  in  pleasure  just  like  taking  opium.  Is  taking  opium  art?  Is  something  that  leads  people  to  seek  for  truth  art?  It  seems  to  be  in  the  category  of  philosophy,  but  how  many  people  like  philosophy?  To  express  one’s  philosophy  viewpoint  by  way  of  shaping  is  the  feature  of  contemporary  art.  Is  something  that  expresses  one’s  inner  thought  art?  Why  do  you  ask  others  to  understand  your  understanding  of  outside  world?  Before  making  art,  one  should  answer  the  question  what  the  art  is.  Art  is  something  that  could  release  people  from  sorrow  and  give  people  happiness.  What  is  the  form  of  art?  What  is  the  content  of  it?

The  realists  are  likely  to  succeed  when  they  seek  success,  but  the  idealists  are  likely  to  fail  when  they  seek  truth.  But  I  still  want  to  salute  the  idealists  as  they  are  so  lovely.  

Even  if  I  would  succeed  one  day  I  would  not  consider  myself  as  a  strong  man.  Before  the  fate,  I  only  feel  weak.  I  would  rejoice  for  my  good  luck.  Fate  would  help  those  who  make  unceasing  efforts  to  improve  themselves,  no  matter  he  granted  me  timely  rain  or  flesh-cut  knives  before.  I  am  not  a  fatalist  either,  and  I  believe:  Man  plans  a  matter,  and  the  Heaven  would  make  it  a  success.  

The  progress  of  the  society  is  marked  by  the  happiness  of  the  people,  then,  what  is  the  mark  of  the  happiness  of  the  people?  This  is  a  matter  of  value  concept.  Then,  who  decides  the  value  concept?  Is  it  the  people?  If  yes,  what  is  the  need  of  the  government  and  the  educational  organizations?  After  all,  the  value  concept  is  the  understanding  of  happiness  of  the  people.  In  the  times  of  unrestrained  material  desires,  the  value  concept  is  undoubtedly  measured  by  money.  According  to  this  viewpoint,  the  happiest  people  should  be  the  richest  people.  But  a  common  saying  goes  as:  “Money  is  not  omnipotent,  but  without  it  nothing  can  be  done.”  Perhaps,  all  are  not  questions  of  either  left  or  right,  but  vacillating  from  left  to  right  is  not  the  correct  answer  either.  

How  many  art  works  we  have  seen  by  now  are  not  the  victims  of  political  speaking  rights  and  interest  speaking  rights?  After  all,  these  speaking  rights  are  the  speaking  rights  for  interests.  For  example,  the  criticism  and  introspection  to  the  politics  are  likely  the  criticism  to  a  certain  political  power  before  or  now.  It  is  controlled  by  either  these  or  those  speaking  rights,  and  it  would  conform  to  one  mainstream  or  be  admitted  by  anther  mainstream.  Is  there  a  kind  of  art  that  criticizes  a  kind  of  ideological  formation  and  thinks  of  a  new  ideological  formation?  Perhaps  yes,  but  it  would  take  the  risk  of  not  being  admitted  by  all  the  speaking  rights.  It  runs  counter  to  the  mainstream  value  concept,  so,  who  would  like  to  do  things  like  that?  Who  can  do  it  like  that?  

The  social  morality  and  orders  of  the  western  countries  are  protected  in  two  ways,  one  is  religion  and  another  is  law.  We  used  to  substitute  the  religious  belief  by  political  belief,  and  the  result  was  good.  But  if  there  were  neither  religious  belief  nor  political  belief,  and  the  laws  were  controlled  by  social  relations  in  a  society,  the  results  would  be  terrible.  

Max  considered  religion  as  spiritual  opium.  Today,  people  take  opium  directly,  why?

To  a  person  who  seeks  for  the  truth,  nobody  would  believe  you  when  no  one  could  understand  your  viewpoint  of  truth.  People  would  follow  you  when  you  have  made  some  success,  and  they  would  abandon  you  when  you  fail  at  last.  That  is  the  realist  side  of  human  nature.  

Philosophy  is  created  by  outstanding  people,  but  there  is  no  philosophy  that  could  understand  thoroughly  about  all  the  truth.  It  is  just  like  a  fortune-teller  who  could  be  very  accurate,  but  he  would  still  be  inaccurate  on  some  points.  That  means  no  fortune-teller  could  understand  fully  all  the  secret  of  the  Heaven.  Is  this  original  feature  of  the  things  we  don’t  know  the  truth?  Is  this  original  feature  of  the  things  we  don’t  know  the  fate?

Success,  those  who  have  not  experienced  many  setbacks  don’t  believe  in  fate,  and  they  believe  that  their  fate  is  mastered  in  their  own  hands.  Those  who  have  experienced  setbacks  are  likely  to  believe  in  fate,  and  those  unlucky  people  also  believe  in  fate.  It  can  be  said  that  the  viewpoint  of  samsara  of  Buddhism  is  dialectical:  People  believe  in  fate  when  they  suffer  misery  and  they  atone  for  their  misdeeds  so  that  they  would  be  happy  for  their  next  life.  They  do  evils  when  they  have  happiness,  and  they  would  fall  into  miserable  fate  again.  

I  send  my  daughter  to  school  everyday,  and  she  is  in  the  same  school  as  I  was  when  I  was  a  child.  She  reads  the  book  more  or  less  the  same  as  I  read  when  I  was  a  child,  only  that  the  surrounding  environment  has  changed.  My  leader’s  father  used  to  be  the  leader  of  my  father,  what  a  fate  samsara  is  this?  Some  people  consider  my  paintings  as  cartoons,  and  that  is  not  important,  but  the  important  thing  is  to  see  the  fate  and  samsara  by  today’s  time  concept.  The  people  in  the  paintings  have  big  eyes  that  have  no  light  points.  They  are  like  me,  very  confused.  

My  daughter  also  likes  painting.  Although  in  her  teacher’s  eyes  she  doesn’t  paint  well,  I  consider  her  purity  and  sincerity  as  precious.  Once,  she  painted  a  green  sun,  and  her  little  friend  said:  “There  is  no  green  sun  at  all.”  But  she  said:  “Then,  the  summer  will  not  be  too  hot  like  that.”  Such  way  of  thinking  made  our  adults  feel  ashamed.  Do  we  paint  to  get  admissions  of  others?  It  should  reflect  a  kind  of  vale  concept.  

Some  people  said  that  my  paintings  were  rather  depressing.  Actually,  everyone  is  depressed  in  his  heart,  only  that  the  extents  of  depression  are  different.  Some  people  can  release  their  depression  and  some  people  cannot,  and  still  some  people  are  so  depressed  that  they  even  don’t  know  what  the  depression  is.  It  is  human  to  let  people  die  in  dark,  but  I  prefer  to  be  alive  clear-headed  in  pain.  Different  personality  decides  different  fate  under  realist  conditions.  

If  they  ask  me  what  plant  I  would  like  to  be,  I  would  say  that  I  want  to  be  cactus.  Cactus  lives  in  desert  that  will  not  die  even  if  there  is  no  rain.  Its  leaves  with  thorns  can  absorb  water  from  the  air  and  prick  others.  Even  though  you  don’t  want  to  hurt  others,  it  is  possible  that  you  would  hurt  others  by  accident.  

Now,  there  are  some  artistic  undertakers  who  have  no  sense  of  responsibility,  no  one  knows  from  what  viewpoint,  they  praise  tyrant  and  tyranny.  What  do  they  want?  There  are  also  some  people  who  always  talk  about  their  lives  as  school  leavers.  Is  it  that  they  are  inborn  noble?  

What  should  people  cherish  most?  It  is  dignity.  When  you  are  alive  without  dignity,  you  should  fight  for  it  even  if  you  would  die  for  it.  When  you  die  without  dignity,  you  could  neither  be  alive  nor  die.  

Now,  it  is  generally  considered  that  installation,  behavior,  and  movie  are  vanguard  art,  and  painting  is  out-of-date.  I  have  thought  of  it  time  and  again,  and  actually,  it  is  only  a  matter  of  formation.  Ideology  develops  continuously,  and  if  the  idea  is  new  and  creative,  you  can  take  the  form  that  is  the  most  suitable.  When  you  don’t  think  the  flat  form  can  express  yourself,  you  can  take  other  forms.

Next